Power Protection and UPS Blog

The Portugeuse Moto GP proved an all round winner for Riello UPS last weekend. We had over 70 people from across the world attend the weekend in Lisbon and Estoril. It wasn’t all bikes though. The weekend was split between presentations on Saturday about Riello and the new Multi Plus UPS, a special banquet on Saturday night attended by Ducati personnel and followed by a full day at the race track on Sunday. Whether you were a motorbike fan or not, the whole weekend was an absolute winner for all concerned.

I was disappointed to learn that the UK’s first Energy Saving day ended with no noticeable reduction in the country’s electricity use. Disappointed but not wholly surprised.

E-day, which started at 1800hrs on Wednesday 27th February 2008 and finished at the same time on 28th was supposed to encourage people to switch off electrical devices they did not need but instead National Grid recorded a 0.01% increase in electricity consumption despite the event being backed by campaign groups such as Greenpeace, Christian Aid and the RSPB, plus major energy companies EDF, e.on and Scottish Power.

I’m not surprised it was a flop for several reasons; firstly, it received little publicity. Secondly, why schedule it in the middle of winter and in the middle of the working week!? Other than not leaving the TV, or other electrical equipment on standby, what devices, machinery or equipment can people do without during their normal working life? It is a symptom of modern society that everything is powered by electricity and most professionals and businesses are unable (and unwilling) to go back to manual operation.

Thirdly (and this is contentious one), I believe that saving the planet from global warming is too big an issue for people to swallow and is therefore not the right one to ‘incentivise’ them to save energy. Of course, I care about the environment (many of my blog entries lay testament to that) but I believe people’s apathy towards this event is very telling. Do they really believe it’s possible to save the planet? Or, do most people feel it is too late anyway, the damage has already been done? The pleasures of living in an ‘always on/always connected’ world are too strong to worry about tomorrow. Some people think saving the planet is not up to us but in the hands of ’the Gods’, a religious icon or ethereal power?

I believe the best and only way to ‘incentivise’ people, particularly business people, into saving energy is through the wallet. Make the core issue saving money and the secondary issue about the planet and you will more likely motivate the masses. Environmental issues are far more of a pr story than money saving ones but the people behind such initiatives as this need to ask themselves why they are doing it - is it really to save the planet or to get publicity? and there lies the rub I fear.

At Riello UPS we take energy saving seriously from an environmental perspective and economic one. Many of our customers, particularly large data centres, are demanding that energy saving innovation be incorporated into UPS technology and we’ve responded by designing units with low input current distortion, maximum input power factor, progressive rectifier start-up and battery care systems to optimize performance that will all combine towards savings in running costs and total cost of ownership over the lifetime of the product. We feel this is a practical step towards saving the planet.

For more information about energy saving UPS visit: Riello UPS

I read with interest on Guardian online that Britain’s oil and gas companies, including BP, Shell and British Gas which recently announced record profits, are saying they need improvements in tax breaks if they are to meet higher production targets in the North Sea.

On the one hand, in my view, it seems they are holding Britain (and every energy consumer in the country) to ransom; ‘give us the economic incentive or we wont invest in North Sea Gas!’. But if we can’t produce enough Gas at home our imports will have to increase and that, I think, is bad news. We have little or no control over foreign supplies, which could be affected by political, economic or regulatory issues beyond our control. We can’t influence continuity or security of supply nor pricing. I think for these reasons Britain’s energy companies should be given some incentivising tax breaks to protect our North Sea interests. Of course it’s a contentious issue and one that will run and run but how else are we supposed to compete on the world stage if we do not protect, or invest in, our own energy assets? Limited as they are we need to keep them operational.

I feel short-changed, having read the specifications and code of practice of the new business continuity standard BS 25999 from BSI. As I mentioned here the other day, problems with mains power supply are far more common than most potential disasters. Incidents of interruption in electricity supply stood at 21 million in 2006 (according to a DTI report), other disasters (such as fire, flood, terrorism, public disorder and so forth) combined could not reach that total. Securing electricity supply is not merely about installing UPS, as with BCM it requires a well thought through and planned out strategy and this is not mentioned once in either the code or specification.

I do not wish to appear to knock the standard. It is, in my view, long overdue and much needed. But I feel that by not specifying a power continuity strategy, it is left wanting. Without electrical energy there would be no business continuity for most businesses and operations. That is a fact. It should, therefor, in my view be a central theme for any BCM strategy and therefore mentioned in BS 25999.

If you want to know more about what constitutes a power continuity strategy read The Power Protection Guide.

Last week I read with interest that more than half (60%) of UK companies are considering certification on the new British Standard for business continuity – BS 25999, according to a survey by Business Continuity Expo 2008. 

It would seem that UK plc is waking up the fact that downtime, of any description, is no longer excusable - particularly on the world stage where the nearest competitor in many business sectors is merely a click away.

I wonder, however, how much emphasis is being placed on certification rather than development of true business continuity practices and implementation of continuity solutions, like power continuity? Without electricity these days there is no business continuity.

I am all for the British Standards and think it is a good thing that so many organizations are planning to take BS 25999 seriously. My concern is that they do not adopt a ‘shortcut to compliance’ attitude as I fear so many of their competitors will.  Anyway, in terms of power continuity, here are a few tips:

1. Obtain a true measurement of your energy use and power capacity. This will highlight areas where you can implement energy efficiency measures whilst enabling you to size power protection equipment such as UPS and generators.
2. Identify systems that can be affected by power problems and categorise them into critical, essential and non-essential loads.
3. Assess typical power quality problems in your area: sags, brownouts, surges, electrical interference, harmonics, blackouts and possible applicable solutions.
4. Consider UPS power protection and emergency back-up power generation (diesel generator, flywheel). Build in maximum levels of reliability and resilience.
5. Develop monitoring and maintenance plans. Consider remote monitoring of UPS by a reputable provider like Riello UPS as an option. Build in a test schedule whereby equipment can be tested under load conditions to ensure it is working.

For more information on power protection see The Power Protection Guide.

It looks like plans to build one of Europe’s largest wind farms on the Isle of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland, are to be turned down.  As one would imagine, local anti-wind farm campaigners are gleeful whilst supporters of the 181 turbine scheme feel embittered.  

I have mixed feelings; on the one hand I am all for harnessing the power of wind to produce energy. We need more energy and we’re not getting enough from fossil fuels. Having visited the Western Isles a couple of years ago, I can tell you, it is one of the windiest places I know!  

However, it is also one of the most beautiful and unspoilt and a big part of me recognises that that is its charm and uniqueness and it should be preserved. Whilst there, I felt like I had entered a very special community that welcomed me with open arms but was not trying to be anything other than what it was nor pander to my whims merely because I was a tourist, like some other holiday destinations. Where else can you go these days where the locals leave everything unlocked because there is no crime? Or you can walk mile upon mile on golden sandy beaches and not see another human being? I can’t help but disagree with Angus Campbell, vice-convener or Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (quoted or BBC News website): “……….Are we to become and environmental museum? Is any development at all to be allowed in the Western Isles?”

There are other parts of Britain, like Yorkshire, Staffordshire, Northumberland and Wales, for example, where ex-open cast mining sites used to be located. Surely they, or similar habitats, can be utilised? I don’t know but what I do know is that it would be a tragedy to do anything that would change the very fabric of the Hebrides – the jewel in the crown of the British Isles.

As if proof were needed that the world is on the brink of an energy crisis, look no further than South Africa! The country is rich in gems and precious metals and some of the world’s largest gold and platinum mining companies. This week they suspended production due to a ‘national emergency’ and spate of recent power cuts, which have ground business to a halt in many areas. 

Two things come to mind: firstly, thank goodness this is 2008 and not a bygone era! Mining company owners and bosses back then would have cared less about health & safety and minors being trapped underground by a power cut than they obviously do now! Drastic though it may seem, they took the right course of action shutting everything down. Secondly, if these companies are some of the world’s largest (and one would assume, richest) in their field, why do they not join forces and lobby the Government for more action on energy issues; including infrastructure construction and maintenance? Surely, above all these days, this is the one element that is an obstacle to a country’s economic growth. 

I love this quote from Goolam Ballim, chief economist of Standard Bank Group, based in South Africa: 

“Power is like Oxygen, it’s essential for any half-modern economy.” 

Absolutely! And protecting its source should be foremost in every business owner’s mind. 

For more information on power protection, visit: Riello UPS

The argument over bio fuels is raging. It centres on two key points: on the one hand bio fuels are said to be good for the environment because they produce fewer emissions than fossil fuels and so can help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that are said to be driving climate change. On the other hand, some organisations believe that bio fuels will do more harm to the environment in the way they are produced unless strict controls are imposed.  

The Royal Society issued a report this week, which followed a 14 month enquiry at the same time as the European Union announced re-examination of its targets for bio fuels because of fears of their impact on the environment. The fear is that forests will be decimated to make way for land on which to grow bio fuel crops.  

It stands to reason that in poor communities where environmental concerns are much less of a priority than putting food on the table, the urge to clear forest to make way for valuable crops would make sense. But it is often not these communities who live on the land who make the decision; it is the Governments and big businesses around the world who will initiate the competition for agricultural land between bio fuels and the crops needed to feed the expanding world population. However you look at it, it would seem trees are doomed and that’s bad news for everyone. It is a well-known fact that curbing carbon dioxide emissions is far easier by restoring and protecting forests.

Meanwhile nearer to home, Centrica last week announced tough times ahead for the industry and customers alike as the rise in wholesale gas and electricity prices continues to bite. It reported a dip in profits on gas and power sales in the residential sector in the UK and warned it would closely monitor fuel bills in light of the wholesale situation. Between you and me, that sounds very much like a prediction for higher fuel bills this winter!

On 4^th December in this blog I wrote about the continued wrangling over the USA Energy Bill (‘Battle Continues over USA Energy Bill……….’). It was hoped it would include the first meaningful increase in fuel efficiency standards for vehicles in the US for decades and a boost in production of biofuels. However, I was disappointed to read on Forbes.com that the Bill was blocked by the Senate last Thursday. It seems the politicians, law-makers and energy industry just can’t agree on a final outline and the Bill is being whittled down to such a degree that one wonders if by the time it gets to President Bush’s office for signature it will be worth having at all?  It seems there is strong opposition to a tax package favouring investment in energy efficiency but coming down heavily on the oil industry. To bring the Bill to a vote Democrats were forced to drop a provision that required utilities to obtain at least 15% of their electricity from renewable sources such as wind and solar power. The Bill now goes to a third reading – albeit watered down – hopefully to be passed before the end of 2007.